In yesterday’s entry I mentioned Warschauer’s suggestion that the divides of EFL/ESL, the digital and technology divides have been overcome, and my personal objection to it.
During the first online chat session for my ICT course, the persistence of the digital divide was eloquently demonstrated. Telecommunications facilities in my region of Oman were interrupted for several hours, resulting in my late arrival and some of my classmates’ inability to log in at all. Here, like in many places worldwide, internet access is crippled by infrastructure problems.
In the discussion, some agreed with Warschauer to the point of saying that internet access is now universal. From my tenuous foothold on this side of the digital divide, I am quite simply gobsmacked. Somewhere there exists a world where that is true. I haven’t visited it.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
THE PLACE OF ENGLISH IN INTERNET COMMUNICATION AND E-DUCATION
My readings for the ICT module have included some think-work based on an article by Mark Warchscauer entitled Wiring English into our Technological World and another by Seth Mydans called Across Cultures, English is the Word. Some thoughts on these…
Warschauer’s central argument is that emerging technologies eliminate three perceived barriers:
1. The distinction between ESL and EFL
2. The digital divide (lack of resources among the world’s poor)
3. The technological divide (the lack of tech skills, even among those who have access to technology.)
Although I can agree with the general argument, as a citizen and lifelong resident of emerging nations, I feel entitled to some criticism of these opinions,
1. ESL/EFL: While English immersion is becoming prevalent in many international workplaces, and fluency increases, inaccuracies may persist, and even be entrenched as a shared interlanguage among L2 speakers. This may be the evolution of the international language, but that does not eliminate prejudice that may exist against L2 speakers. And as a speaker of English as a second language, I am actually allowed to say that!
2. Digital divide: Warschauer's claim that even among the very poor of the world, there is increased accessed to certain shared tech resources is justified. However, many are still left behind, and the divide becomes more and more difficult to cross.
It should also be considered that the vast majority of ICT requires literacy, which cuts out a further segment of the world's population.
Although most languages are represented online, English still rules the waves, and not knowing this world languages sets users at a further disadvantage. In short, Warhschauer has a point, but I can't agree with him completely.
3. Technological divide: The most endangered species here is the technophobic teacher! Even as a one-time internet addict and reincarnated blogger, I often learn shortcuts and new uses for computers and other gadgets from my students. There is a certain threshold of computer skills that will be necessary for teachers to mine the potential of ICT for education. Guiding educators to become e-Ducators will require fundamental attention, particularly in TESOL, where professionalization is not yet prevalent in many contexts worldwide.
Warschauer’s central argument is that emerging technologies eliminate three perceived barriers:
1. The distinction between ESL and EFL
2. The digital divide (lack of resources among the world’s poor)
3. The technological divide (the lack of tech skills, even among those who have access to technology.)
Although I can agree with the general argument, as a citizen and lifelong resident of emerging nations, I feel entitled to some criticism of these opinions,
1. ESL/EFL: While English immersion is becoming prevalent in many international workplaces, and fluency increases, inaccuracies may persist, and even be entrenched as a shared interlanguage among L2 speakers. This may be the evolution of the international language, but that does not eliminate prejudice that may exist against L2 speakers. And as a speaker of English as a second language, I am actually allowed to say that!
2. Digital divide: Warschauer's claim that even among the very poor of the world, there is increased accessed to certain shared tech resources is justified. However, many are still left behind, and the divide becomes more and more difficult to cross.
It should also be considered that the vast majority of ICT requires literacy, which cuts out a further segment of the world's population.
Although most languages are represented online, English still rules the waves, and not knowing this world languages sets users at a further disadvantage. In short, Warhschauer has a point, but I can't agree with him completely.
3. Technological divide: The most endangered species here is the technophobic teacher! Even as a one-time internet addict and reincarnated blogger, I often learn shortcuts and new uses for computers and other gadgets from my students. There is a certain threshold of computer skills that will be necessary for teachers to mine the potential of ICT for education. Guiding educators to become e-Ducators will require fundamental attention, particularly in TESOL, where professionalization is not yet prevalent in many contexts worldwide.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
BRAVE NEW WORLD, VIRTUALLY
There is something of the scent of danger about my study session tonight. Where I am usually cozily surrounded by my fortress of chunky books and printed-out articles when I sit down to study, tonight my desk is bare except for my laptop.
Stripped of my reams of stationery I feel cold and lost and bare and afraid. Even though I am no luddite, learning this way is an unaccustomed adrenaline-throbbing terror of a thrill. The endless abyss of options gapes at me: while unit notes are sensibly sitting on my screen, they open up into a myriad of fractal possibilities: hyperlinks scattering off into an unseen horizon, mp3s on classes (and every other imaginable soundtrack) thronging for my attention along with the rest of the wondrous wilful wilds of the web.
This is a whole new mode of learning, and it may very well be true that a new generation of ‘digital natives’ will feel extremely comfortable in it. I am not- and educators from previous generations probably feel even more intimidated than I do.
But if learning is to reach new generations, it will have to be in a medium they understand. And interactive e-learning certainly speaks their language.
The only question is… do I?
Stripped of my reams of stationery I feel cold and lost and bare and afraid. Even though I am no luddite, learning this way is an unaccustomed adrenaline-throbbing terror of a thrill. The endless abyss of options gapes at me: while unit notes are sensibly sitting on my screen, they open up into a myriad of fractal possibilities: hyperlinks scattering off into an unseen horizon, mp3s on classes (and every other imaginable soundtrack) thronging for my attention along with the rest of the wondrous wilful wilds of the web.
This is a whole new mode of learning, and it may very well be true that a new generation of ‘digital natives’ will feel extremely comfortable in it. I am not- and educators from previous generations probably feel even more intimidated than I do.
But if learning is to reach new generations, it will have to be in a medium they understand. And interactive e-learning certainly speaks their language.
The only question is… do I?
Friday, January 23, 2009
RESURRECTION
Justifying the disappearance- temporary or otherwise- of a blog is so standard that I will not even go into the reasons. We all know how it goes. My nutshell justification would be my virtual bumper sticker of the moment: Life was so easy before I got one. Nuf said.
The resurrection in question is not only that of my blog. Blogs, especially those related to a personal passion- tend to follow the waxing and waning of the passion. Throwing myself into what I am doing- work, study, life- became such a time- and energy- consuming activity that the fire behind it was reduced to embers in the past months. I was beginning to wonder if it had been doused completely.
But stepping away can be the best medicine. After working my fingers to the bone in my coordination duties at work over the past semester, and finding that it was still not enough, I had the sense that everything else had suffered, including my teaching and my studies, not to mention my personal wellbeing. For three weeks in January, though, I have the luxury of stepping back from work to attend classes for my masters program. From this, new developments have emerged.
Taking time to re-invigorate my theoretical interests and regain perspective on what it is that I do, and disciplining myself to relax (not as easy as it sounds), while entrusting colleagues with matters at work, has kindled those fragile embers. The flames are returning, and with care they may blaze again.
There are many educational mistakes of the past semester to learn from, in all areas from my teaching to my coordination to my studies to my work-life balance. That is what mistakes are for- and in fact they only are mistakes if I do not learn from them.
I am fortunate, blessed, downright lucky. I have so many opportunities, inspired colleagues, wondrous friends and a ragbag bucketful of abilities and experience and hard-won skills. To say that these could be wasted is not entirely correct. But that they can be used in ever better ways would be fair.
Resurrecting my blog is one of them.
The resurrection in question is not only that of my blog. Blogs, especially those related to a personal passion- tend to follow the waxing and waning of the passion. Throwing myself into what I am doing- work, study, life- became such a time- and energy- consuming activity that the fire behind it was reduced to embers in the past months. I was beginning to wonder if it had been doused completely.
But stepping away can be the best medicine. After working my fingers to the bone in my coordination duties at work over the past semester, and finding that it was still not enough, I had the sense that everything else had suffered, including my teaching and my studies, not to mention my personal wellbeing. For three weeks in January, though, I have the luxury of stepping back from work to attend classes for my masters program. From this, new developments have emerged.
Taking time to re-invigorate my theoretical interests and regain perspective on what it is that I do, and disciplining myself to relax (not as easy as it sounds), while entrusting colleagues with matters at work, has kindled those fragile embers. The flames are returning, and with care they may blaze again.
There are many educational mistakes of the past semester to learn from, in all areas from my teaching to my coordination to my studies to my work-life balance. That is what mistakes are for- and in fact they only are mistakes if I do not learn from them.
I am fortunate, blessed, downright lucky. I have so many opportunities, inspired colleagues, wondrous friends and a ragbag bucketful of abilities and experience and hard-won skills. To say that these could be wasted is not entirely correct. But that they can be used in ever better ways would be fair.
Resurrecting my blog is one of them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
